h1

The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett

January 17, 2007

Ken Follett is no stranger to the espionage novel — he’s churned several best-selling thrillers that display his mastery of suspense. His subjects have ranged from bio-terrorism in Scotland to crime trafficking in Victorian England to covert operations in Nazi Germany. His true masterpiece, however, takes readers beyond global intrigue and espionage and into the long-past realm of medieval England. The Pillars of the Earth is historical fiction, like many of Follett’s novels, but deviates from his usual thriller formula. Instead, it is a multi-perspective simulation of what life was possibly like in the 12th century. Follett’s tale is realistically bleak, utilizing the harsh language, Byzantine politics, and chaotic behavior of the time. Death is prominent and cruel characters are abounding. Follett even details, in his own creatively gruesome method, the death of Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The move is bold — retelling history is a tricky endeavor — but offers a dramatic twist to a highly relevant historical event.

What separates The Pillars of the Earth from other historical novels is not its realism, but the skillful weaving of multiple tales into one larger chronicle. There are multiple protagonists, each with their own deliberate goal and obstacle. Tom Builder, a mason with a dream to construct a massive cathedral, struggles to find work to keep his impoverished family from starving. Philip, a clever country clergyman, is given the task of maintaining a run down priory in Kingsbridge and must transform the church estate into a profitable asset. Aliena, the daughter of the Earl of Shiring, is flung unto the streets and forced to sustain her younger brother, an aspiring squire, after her father is overthrown by a greedy neighboring lord.

Through the course of the novel, Follett forces the reader to relive a chaotic world in which uncertainty dominates the society and politics of the time. Characters are dynamic in the strictest sense of the word, displaying a broad range of emotions typical of human personality. The feral and awkward child, Jack, is tamed by his adoration of the heiress Aliena. Through a series of encounters with Tom Builder, Jack eventually becomes his apprentice, inheriting Tom’s dream of becoming a master architect. The story’s main antagonist, William, is dastardly through and through, but struggles with the prevailing faith of the time through his morbid and disheartening fear of the horrors of Hell. Philip, who is outwardly warm, hospitable, and religious, develops ambition and is forced to adopt a sterner attitude to match the anarchy of the 12th century. At 973 pages, Follett’s novel is epic — he details their struggles and interactions in a storyline that spans nearly half a century. With the exception of an unexpected shift in protagonists, the story is seamless, offering a balanced blend of suspense, drama, action, politics and history while maintaining a thought-provoking plot. There are more than a few decent historical accounts of the medieval period, but few match the masterful storytelling in The Pillars of the Earth.

 

11 comments

  1. I’m not sure I have any real complaints. Your review is thoughtful and follows a specific formula – introduction, synopsis, details. reasoning. I enjoyed it and you made me want to read the book – which is the whole point after all, isn’t it?

    Good first post!


  2. good review. This book looks quite interesting. The review is a little rigid and a little too formal. Also, I think some more time spent on the critic of the book rather then the content of the book is needed. I know its hard to do that in five hundred words but too much content doesn’t tell me much about the book. Other wise a excellent first post!


  3. ….Ummm…I have little to nothing to say. This was a very good review. I will say though that maybe you should cut down on how much you talk about the characters. You give several examples and you might be able to get another point of intrest put in if you cut it. Overall I agree with Whit and what to read it.


  4. You made me want to read the book as well as Whit. You made it all sound so intriguing and fun, who wouldn’t want to give it a read. I will suggest what Sam, did, though. When you started talking about the historicity of the novel and how it deviates from the trends of historical fiction, I became utterly fascinated. I would like to think that was because it is very insightful criticism, not because I am a history student.

    If you concentrate on specifically themed trains of thought like that, your reviews will do more than make people want to read the book and offer a baseline description. They will give us readers additional insights into the media that we might not have noticed on our own.

    All in all, this is very good going, though. Great review, and excellent use of the WC.


  5. Excellent work. You could probably use a little more criticism versus story details, but knowing how much plot summary is sufficient, especially for a book this long, takes practice. You’re off to a good start.


  6. Excellent indeed. Your critique was very structured yet interesting enough to keep me engaged. Great first post!


  7. Wow, totally refreshing!!! As in most things in life, in writing what is actually written is often times less important than how a piece is written. You hit both aspects head on. Your diction was good; you transitioned smoothly between paragaphs, and most importantly you lead me easily from the first word to the last. Your synopsis was great; mentioning the plots without really explaining them was a great idea. Thanks. Your entry was an enjoyable read.


  8. I read this book when I was about your age, being a fan of Follett’s espionage thrillers. I remember ordering it in my initial “six for a penny” order from a book club. It was not what I was expecting, but I really liked it and remember it fondly today. You might like THE SPIRE by William Golding (author of LORD OF THE FLIES), another nuanced portrayal of cathedral building.

    Your review makes an excellent start for this blog. I like the way you are confident in your writing voice — there’s nothing timid about the way you write. Your diction (word choice) is vivid as well, without being showy or misdirected. I agree with Mark that the balance of story detail and context or elucidation is tricky — it’s something you can play with as you continue writing.


  9. Awesome first post. I really enjoyed reading about the characters (though I agree that a bit more criticism would be nice), and your wording is beautiful. I do not have a lot more to say about this blog, so I will wait for your next one!


  10. Hi!I’ve been looking for a review that mirrors my own perception of this book and this post is one of the best I’ve found. Since I’ve read Pillars of the Earth two years ago, I can’t write a review for this book, unless I read it again–for which I don’t have the time nor inclination with a huge TBR pile. So, I hope you don’t mind my linking your post to mine. You may check it out at http://josbookshelf.wordpress.com.


  11. [...] Binary Primate does a good review of this novel.  And so does 2nd Monday Dogs.  Please do check them out. [...]



Leave a Comment